World Culture Essay Example

World Culture Essay Example World Culture Essay World Culture Essay It is a fact that human race is entirely diverse and that cultures from different walks of life may not entirely share the same values and social norms. However, philosophically speaking, can we consider that what is good for us is universally good for everybody?In general, the term â€Å"good† has several meanings in its context. Many use the word â€Å"good† to imply what is moral. However, in another context, the word â€Å"good† entails being in a desirable or pleasing state; a condition that benefits, promotes, or enhances our well-being. All things considered, this argues that the word â€Å"good† may be universally applicable only if it means that good is a word that promotes the obstruction of harm to human race in general.Such condition may be clearly depicted in the processes of groups such as the United Nations wherein its topmost function is to eradicate what is generally harmful to the human race as stated by the Baha’i International Co mmunity Statement Library. Thus, good, in the context of forces such as this organization, is something that is moral in its perspective, desirable to the status quo, and pleasing to social norms. For this group, the utmost priority is to make sure that the human race is protected with basic human rights, is not deprived of the necessities of life, and is not innocently harmed by forces which are too big to be fought by individuals. This kind of underpinning makes the organization an assembly which depicts good as something that is integrated and beyond the boundaries of cultural diversity.For instance, it is a universal moral standard that everyone should not be deprived of the basic necessity of food. Thus, intentional hording of food which consequently deprives others their right to eat is a violation of human rights. To make it moral, acceptable, and desirable, everyone should not be hungered. Therefore, the concept of the eradication of hunger is deemed something good not only for us but for everyone among the rest of the world.In conclusion, the word good may be interpreted in many perspectives. Nonetheless, the question of the applicability of the word â€Å"good† universally is subjective to what is moral, acceptable, and desirable in different cultures. However, we can consider the idea that what is good for us may be good in entirety only if these are upheld by institutions that act as a universal aid to the issues of human race that hinders the promotion of its perspective of what is good.Work CitedBahà ­ International Communitys. â€Å"Freedom to Believe: Upholding the Standard of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.† Statement on the Freedom of Religion or Belief. BIC Document #05-1001. October 2005. Bahà ­ International Community: History of Active Cooperation with the United Nations. 15 December 2008 ;bic-un.bahai.org/05-1001.htm;.;