Thos Pynchons The Crying of Lot 49: No Escape Essay -- Crying Lot 49

There are two levels of participation within The blatant of band 49 that of the characters, such as Oedipa Maas, whose world is limited to the text, and that of the reader, who looks at the world from outside it unless who is also affected the world created by the text.3 two the reader and the characters have the same problems observing the chaos around them. The protagonist in The Crying of spile 49, Oedipa Mass, like the reader, is forced to either involve herself in the deciphering of clues or not participate at all.4 The philosophy behind The Crying of Lot 49 seems to lie in the synthesis of philosophers and modern physicists. Ludwig Wittgenstein viewed the world as a totality of facts, not of things.1 This idea can be combined with a physicists view of the world as a closed formation that tends towards chaos. Pynchon asserts that the measure of the world is its entropy.2 He extends this metaphor to his fictional world. He envelops the reader, through various means, withi n the system of The Crying of Lot 49. Pynchon designed The Crying of Lot 49 so that there would be two levels of observation that of the characters such as our own Oedipa Maas, whose world is limited to the text, and that of the reader, who looks at the world from outside it but who is also affected by his relationship to that world.3 Both the reader and the characters have the same problems observing the chaos around them. The protagonist in The Crying of Lot 49, Oedipa Mass, like Pynchons audience, is forced to either involve herself in the deciphering of clues or not participate at all.4 Oedipas purpose, besides executing a will, is finding meaning in a life dominated by assaults on peoples perceptions through drug... ...rying of Lot 49, Mindful Pleasures (Boston Little, Brown, 1976), p. 3. 5 John Johnston. Paranoia as a Semiotic Regime in The Crying of Lot 49,New Essays on the Crying of Lot 49 (New York Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 6 Paranoia, p. 4. 7 The Gr im Phoenix, p. 15. 8 Crying of Lot 49, p. 49. 9 Robert Hipkiss, The American Absurd, (University of Chicago New York), p. 90 10 Paranoia as a Semiotic Regime, p. 6. 11 Crying of Lot 49, p. 58. 12 Crying of Lot 49, p. 22 . 13 The Grim Phoenix, p. 26 . 14 Paranoia as a Semiotic Regime, p. 1 . 15 Crying of Lot 49, p. 69. 16 Crying of Lot 49, p. 79 . 17 David Seed, Fictional Labyrinths of Thomas Pynchon (University of Iowa Press Iowa City), p. 124.

Criminal Justice System :: essays research papers

I do feel that they will be effecitve and in the abutting few pages I will explain why I feel this way and why I book taken this stand. First of all I read through the whole charter and as boring as it was I made it through unscaved. Just like anything in order to have something you need a purpose. A reason for doing something. The reason why this charter was brought forward was because that they realized that during that century millions of children, mean and women have been victims of unimaginable atrocities that deeply floor the conscience of humanity. That sounds like enough for me. When I read that, I was think Oh my God, I mean come on unimaginable atrocities. It is obvious that something that to be done and even the littlest change would make a difference. The first thing they did was establish a Court. This court was permanent and had the power to exercise its jurisdiction over people for the most serious crimes. What I like about this and a reason why I feel it will wo rk excessively is that in the beginning of the charter is that they have a relationship with the United Nations. This relationship only makes this court stronger. Part III of the charter looks a freshet like a military code of justice. It exercises principles to be followed by the court or in the military a Commander if you will. It appears to me that this charters susceptibility is in Part III, because here is where all the rules or articles are that explain what bum be done by the court and what can not be done. It breaks it down to the core, including what to do with someone under 18 years of age. I feel that this is where the strength of the court lies. It defines who is a criminal and who is not, it tells us when the court can pursue a criminal or when a crime is not comitted. The further I got into the parts, the more I strongly I feel about saying they will be effective. It seems as if this court is no different then another court we have in the USA. Part four sets up th e membership. It states who is in charge of what and what their responsibilites should be. When you have people who know what they are supposed to do and that they are held accountable to their jobs then failure is not an option.

Against Louis Riels Execution :: essays research papers

Louis Riel should not have been hung because he beed those who couldnt represent themselves. Louis Riel was disappointed with the way the Mtis were, so he took it upon himself to represent the Mtis and their rights. Even though the actions that followed, such as keeping the new governor out the colony, was illegal and genuinely wrong. Riel risked it for the rights of the Mtis. As for Thomas Scott, Riel has abruptly no legal right to have him shot, but Riel himself never touched a gun for that purpose. He had a firing squad shoot Scott. Although, Riel whitethorn have ordered the squad to shoot, but the men could have backed down, no matter how powerful Riel seemed. After the rebellion, he was elected by Manitoba to put in the House of Commons. Riel went to Ottawa but was not allowed to sit as a member in the House, for he was threatened by many to be shot if he appeared in the House. This was the mistake of the government. They should have sopped the nonsense and threats. For Riel was a man of ideas. He was a man who was knowledged in the government. It was obvious since he create his own government. Riel would have been an asset to the Canadian government. In 1884, Gabriel Dumont rode to Montana and asked Riel to defend the Mtis once again. Riel returned to help the natives once more. Riel was risking capture when he returned. This was a very noble act on his part. Instead of staying nice and safe in Montana, Riel gave up his safety for the Mtis. Riel decided to try an unviolent approach this time quite of starting an all out rebellion. Riel and the Mtis drew up a request and presented it to the government. The petition, which demanded more food and money for the natives, was looked over but not acted upon. The petition was fair in all parts but the government turned it down. It only demanded that what belonged to the natives be returned. In early 1885, Riel formed another(prenominal) provisional government, and started another rebellion. His followers k illed many army troops, but once again it was not the hand of Riel that killed so many. It was of people who had their own thoughts and intuitions. They could have easily said no to Riel instead of shooting. In which case Riel was

A Sample and Critique of psi Research :: Telepathy Precognition Psychic Papers

Do you remember how electrical currents and unseen waves were laughed at? The knowledge about man is unflurried in its infancy. - Albert EinsteinIntroductionPerception of future events (precognition), communication through thoughts (telepathy), material manipulation without physical contact (telekinesis), sight of an object or gravel millions of miles away with enough accuracy to draw it (remote viewing) these be a few cases of what is referred to as psi phenomena, also known as parapsychological or mentalal phenomena. Psi refers to anomalous processes of energy or information transfer... that are currently unexplained in terms of known physical or biological mechanisms.(1) yearn dismissed by scientists and other skeptics all over the world, these occurrences are lots attributed to trickery, hallucination, lying, chance, and even spiritual influence. Claims of psychic ability come from many varied sources. From the paladin who has premonitory dreams and the dog who knows when the master has decided to come home, to the glamorous astrologer with a 900-number and the clairvoyant with a TV show, stories of paranormal abilities range from personal and thought-provoking to distant and Hollywood-esque. Are these things really possible? What does the scientific confederacy actually know about these phenomena? Ultimately, one must ask the question, what can the scientific community know about these phenomena?This paper is intended to provide a small sample and critique of the available scientific research on these unexplained and often dismissed phenomena. The examples which form this review are research on unexplained phenomena not associated with psychic individuals, large-scale research centering on many individuals with psychic talent, and an investigation of the claimed abilities of a single internationally celebrated psychic.Despite the historical and prevalent stigma and sensationalization associated with this field, many respected educational establis hments have laboratories involved in the research of psi. The Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research program, instituted in 1979 to investigate mind-matter interactions (2) the Parapsychological Association, a 1957 offshoot of the Duke Laboratory (3) the Koestler Parapsychology Unit at the University of Edinburgh (4) and Stanford Universitys 1946 endeavor, Stanford Research Institute are four of these. It should be noted that Stanford Research Institute separated from the university in 1970, and became SRI International. (5)ExamplesImpersonal phenomenaIf a person is asked to identify the color of a rectangle, and is subsequently asked to testify a randomly generated color name, it is well-known that a matching color name will be called out faster than a mismatching color name.

The Most Deadly Drugs are Already Legal Essay -- Argumentative Persuas

This is your brain. This is your brain on drugs. Fried egg is probably the most influential commercial of our generation. We feared it, we laughed at it, some of us halt eating eggs, and we made a mound of t-shirts about it. And who was scaring us? Who was so concerned about our health? Our loving friends The partnership for a Drug-Free the States (PDFA). We used to watch those commercials and get all warm and fuzzy inside, someone out there cared enough about us to spend a lot of money on those frightening ads. Those good people down at the PDFA really dont want us using drugs. Or do they? The truth is, the Partnership for a Drug-Free America demonizes illegal drugs to protect the legal and profitable ones that kill more people. And this delicate maneuvering of the spotlight serves one purpose to put a lot of cash in to the pockets of a few pharmaceutical, alcohol, and tobacco corporations. The tight-knit relationship between corporate drug peddlers and the PDFA is borne out mo st clearly by the organizations impressive list of funders. From 1988 to 1991, 54% of the $5.8 million the PDFA took from its top twenty-five contributors came from pharmaceutical companies. The other 46%? Largely tobacco and alcohol. Why are these huge corporations donating such(prenominal) large sums of money to the PDFA? Because they know that the PDFA strongly influences our conception of acceptability Whatever drug the PDFA chooses to attack becomes a taboo, while drugs the PDFA chooses to ignore become a right joy. Because of this funding structure, even if the PDFA wanted to criticize the profitable drugs, it couldnt. Former Assistant Secretary of State for International Narcotics Matters Mathea Falco explains, It would be suicidal if the Pa... ...s, One of the reasons youthfulness people have no faith in what we say about drugs is because of the lies by people like the Partnership. (St. Petersburg Times, 1990) Corporations are making big bucks and children are dying. al ternatively of spending a billion dollars to spit nonsense into young minds, the Partnership should be informing them about the dangers of all drugs, illegal and legal, worthless and profitable. And instead of convince kids that everyone who smokes pot is a crazy murderer, they should differentiate between drugs and admit that heroin is not the same as marijuana. Without the childrens trust, the entire message is worthless. Next time you front an Excedrin commercial, a Just Say No commercial, and then a Miller Lite commercial, realize that they are all the same. This is your brain. This is your brain on the Partnership for a Drug-Free America.

The Most Deadly Drugs are Already Legal Essay -- Argumentative Persuas

This is your brain. This is your brain on drugs. Fried egg is probably the most powerful commercial of our generation. We fe bed it, we laughed at it, some of us stopped eating eggs, and we made a lot of t-shirts somewhat it. And who was scaring us? Who was so concerned about our wellness? Our loving friends The Partnership for a Drug-Free America (PDFA). We used to watch those commercials and get all warm and fuzzy inside, someone out there cared lavish about us to spend a lot of money on those frightening ads. Those good people down at the PDFA really dont want us using drugs. Or do they? The truth is, the Partnership for a Drug-Free America demonizes illegal drugs to protect the legal and profitable ones that kill more people. And this diffused maneuvering of the spotlight serves one purpose to put a lot of cash in to the pockets of a few pharmaceutical, alcohol, and tobacco corporations. The tight-knit relationship between incorporated drug peddlers and the PDFA is borne o ut most clearly by the organizations impressive list of funders. From 1988 to 1991, 54% of the $5.8 million the PDFA took from its top twenty-five contributors came from pharmaceutical companies. The other 46%? for the most part tobacco and alcohol. Why are these huge corporations donating such large sums of money to the PDFA? Because they know that the PDFA strongly influences our conception of acceptability Whatever drug the PDFA chooses to attack becomes a taboo, while drugs the PDFA chooses to ignore become a spotless joy. Because of this funding structure, even if the PDFA wanted to criticize the profitable drugs, it couldnt. Former Assistant Secretary of State for world-wide Narcotics Matters Mathea Falco explains, It would be suicidal if the Pa... ...s, One of the reasons young people have no faith in what we say about drugs is because of the lies by people corresponding the Partnership. (St. Petersburg Times, 1990) Corporations are making big bucks and children are dyi ng. Instead of spending a billion dollars to spit nonsense into young minds, the Partnership should be informing them about the dangers of all drugs, illegal and legal, worthless and profitable. And instead of convincing kids that everyone who smokes pot is a crazy murderer, they should differentiate between drugs and admit that heroin is not the same as marijuana. Without the childrens trust, the entire message is worthless. Next time you see an Excedrin commercial, a Just Say No commercial, and then a Miller Lite commercial, realize that they are all the same. This is your brain. This is your brain on the Partnership for a Drug-Free America.